The Cervical Osteology of Okapia johnstoni and Giraffa camelopardalis

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136552

Research by

Melinda Danowitz, Nikos Solounias

Compares giraffe and okapi cervical anatomy and the shifted cervicothoracic transition.

Study summary

Part of a giraffe's chest backbone has features of a neck. The boundary between neck and chest is less straightforward than a count of bones suggests. Giraffes have seven neck vertebrae, yet the first vertebra carrying ribs resembles a continuation of the neck in several aspects of its shape.

Melinda Danowitz and Nikos Solounias compared six adult giraffe and eleven okapi skeletons in museum collections, taking detailed measurements from three of each. They described the neck bones and the transition into the chest, examining joint surfaces, projecting processes and the locations of structures where muscles attach. The short-necked okapi provided a comparison within the same family, making it possible to distinguish giraffe specialisations from shared features.

The giraffe's third through seventh neck vertebrae were unusually similar to one another, whereas the corresponding okapi bones changed shape more markedly along the sequence. The strongest anatomical transition towards the chest also occurred one vertebra farther back in giraffes. These are comparisons of skeletons, not measurements of movement or muscle forces in living animals. They reveal that elongating the giraffe neck involved reorganising a sequence of bones and its boundary with the chest, rather than simply making seven ordinary vertebrae longer.

Summary by The Last Giraffe

Publication details

Study facts

Method
Comparative skeletal anatomy
Location
Museum collections in the United States, Sweden and Switzerland
Species
Giraffa camelopardalis and Okapia johnstoni
Sample
Six adult giraffes and 11 okapis; detailed measurements from three of each
Period
Not specified

Full citation

Melinda Danowitz, Nikos Solounias (2015). The Cervical Osteology of Okapia johnstoni and Giraffa camelopardalis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136552

Open the original publication